Friday, December 29, 2006

"The Weather Makers"

Over the holidays I read Tim Flannery's new book, "The Weather Makers" - and I have to say, if you were only to read ONE environmentally-themed book in your life, this should be it.

Flannery writes engagingly, intelligently, and with the confidence of an author who knows his subject inside and out. With supporting research in biology, chemistry, physics, and history he pieces together the problem of Climate Change and the fate of humankind. Most importantly, he does not drown the reader in scientific jargon or the bleakness of fatalism: it is not too late to make a difference! Flannery then offers a list of inexpensive, every-day things each of us can do to reduce our greenhouse emissions by 70%, an amount that would - by most estimates - allow the Earth's climate to stabilize, keeping us humans around for a few more generations at least!

Saturday, December 23, 2006

Global Warming Christmas?

Some of the scare about global warming and ecological collapse can be couched in terms that the average consumer will understand: climate change will cut into annual sales of fur coats.

This seems to be the biggest worry for many US retailers as the East Coast is continuing to experience unusually high temperatures for winter. This has of course an opposite effect as customers who previously might have purchased a winter coat are left with extra money on their hands, preferring to buy electronic gadgets instead. However, the most incredible line is this NY Times article is:
Even if temperatures remain unusually warm, the season is unlikely to become a total washout for retailers. Michael Fink, head of women’s fashion at Saks, said that even in warm seasons like this one, “The key fashion coats sell no matter what.”

“It’s not about warmth,” he said, “it’s about want.”
Indeed, Mr. Fink, it is all about want.

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Gift-giving is Economically Unsound

I'm not trying to beat a dead horse here, but if you were still intending to go all materialistic for the holidays (and that is your right, of course!) you should just pause one moment and check out this article suggesting that gift-giving is an inefficient use of resources from an economic standpoint!

Apparently, we only value gifts received at an average of 4/5 their intrinsic value! In other words, we as consumers know best how to spend our money at each marginal dollar. The conclusion to this is that buying gift certificates or giving cash is the most efficient way to allocate resources; of course, this is decried by the merciless consumerists and traditionalists as a kill-joy approach to Christmas (or birthdays, or what-have-you).

Scrooge just can't win, huh? (Thanks to ACOMMUNIST for the suggestion!)

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Buy Nothing Christmas

Most of us aren't ready for this yet, but check out www.buynothingchristmas.org for environmentally and socially-conscious alternatives to the traditional Christmas consumerism.

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Do you have Affluenza? Take this quiz.

Affluenza... It's a highly contagious and devastating illness. It threatens your happiness, your health, and your family life.

Test your consumption quotient to learn about the disease, then self-diagnose yourself with this quiz. But do not fear, it's a curable condition, and you'll be on your feet in no time.

Monday, December 11, 2006

Cycling in the Buff

I'm up to my eyeballs in final exams this week, so here's some light fare. If you haven't yet heard of the Naked Bike Rides for the environment, held in various cities world-wide... well now you have. All I can think of is... that's gotta hurt.

If you wanna learn more, check out their website. Personally, I think the Ottawa Critical Mass rides would be just as effective, and perhaps less offensive... oh well, it piqued your curiosity now, didn't it?

Wednesday, December 6, 2006

Apocalypse?

It's time for some philsophical thought on why we Go Green and what might happen if we continue to destroy our environment (à la QB):
I can think of three major apocalyptic scenarios resulting from the reckless destruction of our world:

1) We will finally push the limits of the natural order, and the Earth will restore her balance by reducing the human footprint through catastrophic disorder (floods, earthquakes, and/or plagues on a massive scale).

2) We will succeed in driving humanity totally to extinction, taking many other life-forms with us, and rendering the planet uninhabitable: a desolate wasteland orbiting the Sun. This does not discount the idea that evolution could begin all over again after millennia (as long as there is matter and energy in our universe, life is a possibility), but it is unlikely we would recognize the resulting organisms, since the very essence of the Earth—the balance of her elements—would have changed.

3) We will incur the wrath of an omnipotent Creator/ Divine Being, the consequences of which cannot be imagined, as they are not restricted to the laws of nature.

NOTE: It is a futile exercise to “prefer” any of these scenarios: if only we could all take a few minutes to look beyond our daily tasks and consider some of the most basic questions of life, how much we might be changed!

Monday, December 4, 2006

E-duce, E-use, E-cycle.

Ever wondered what to do with so-called "E-Waste", those old TV's, broken printers, and obsolete computers you have collecting dust in the basement?

While we might surreptitiously leave these items on the curb a night early, hoping for someone else to salvage/ recycle them for us, our friends in Saskatchewan know just what to do... 'E-Cycle. This means that the plastics, metal, and glass in various electronic devices can be recycled, while toxic wastes are safely disposed of.

OttawaU Kills Trees

The UO School of Managment, whose wonderful admin has bungled my registration countless times (now my Infoweb account shows that I have not graduated after all - just wait til I take a bite out of them tomorrow!) is prone to sending paper junk-mail to unsuspecting students.

This glossy piece of paper-waste is meant to inform us plebes about the Mindtrust Leadership Development Program. Now first of all, fellow students, this is your tuition money at work. Secondly, what the heck kind of name is Mindtrust? Reminds me of the Matrix, some brain-washing activity is definitely going on here; even if it's just to suck the creative energy out of young people. Bah, we know, we know: that's why we all signed up for this.

Well folks: if you need to take ANOTHER leadership development program after hacking away at a B.Com for 4+ years, there is something mightily wrong with you. Perhaps the SOM didn't teach us enough about self-confidence, or maybe they're just saving up for the next huge, state-of-the-art building to house their huge, state-0f-the-art ego. What will you actually learn? Well according to the Testimonials section of the Mindtrust pamphlet, you'll learn how to spin your rhetoric with the greatest of ease.

Classes we didn't take but might as well have:

1. Cumbersome verbosity 1101.
2. The art of looking smart 2020.
3. The art of looking smart 2021: Just in case you didn't get it the first time.
4. Defending a lost cause 4052.
5. Sucking up 3031: a social and economic history.

This should've been my last day as an undergraduate student; instead I have to f*** around with the administration and convince them that yes, ahem, I have completed all the d*** credits. And you know what you can do with your Dean's List? Stuff it up your f***ing a**.

I'm outa here.

Sunday, December 3, 2006

Kyoto is, literally, Dion's dog

New Liberal leader Stéphane Dion is a staunch supporter of Kyoto, supposedly naming his dog Kyoto after the (pretty much failed) environmental Protocol. While the Conservatives attest that Canada's emissions actually rose while he was environment minister (under Martin), at least his heart is in the right place. However, he's thought up some crazy ways to save our natural world - including trying to tame Alberta's massive oilsands projects with the hopeful statement:
"We will not kill the industry. We will make the industry sustainable."
Yeah yeah, but Mr. Dion, we still have the problem of oil, the extraction of which is harmful to the environment, and the utilization of its end products (i.e. gasoline) which are also harmful to the environment. We can't make the oil industry sustainable because it is inherently not sustainable, and while big business is flush with petro-cash we can hardly begin to suggest alternative uses of energy.

What about economic incentives for renewable energy initiatives? Why don't we preach conservation? Why can't we make our current gas-powered engines more efficient?

We have to convince the rich, fat cats of the oil companies that the industry is going the way of the telegraph, that new sources of energy will prove even more lucrative to them in the future. And for that to happen, there needs to be a movement at the grassroots level, a shift in environmental awareness. To influence the supply of energy, we need to alter the demand.

"Kyoto, I've got a feeling we're not in Tansas anymore!"

Saturday, December 2, 2006

Napkin Rations

Amazing, all these life lessons one can learn at a homeless shelter!

Today I discovered an economic principle related to the supplying of paper napkins at mealtime. After noticing for the past few weeks that the clients tended to hoard stacks of napkins and leave them unused on the table after meals, I suggested that we fill the dispensers only half full each time. Secretly, I expected an increase of complaints about the lack of napkins.

However, that did not happen! Instead, those unseemly "stacks" disappeared, and there were fewer unused napkins littering the floor. To date, I have not heard a single complaint; and the dispensers are rarely all emptied during mealtimes. Whether the clients barter among themselves for serviettes, or just have begun to realize the ecological hazards of waste, an important lesson has been learned: when we cannot see the "end" of the resources (when the supply of goods is high) we tend to consume more than we truly require.

As the Christmas season is upon us, I would also like to suggest that "when prices are relatively low, we tend to buy more 'stuff' than we actually need". If only we'd be able to see the big picture...

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Happiness: An Exhortation

In this work-and-spend world, "happiness" is simply a marketing gimmick.

We're taught that we "should" enjoy this and we "shouldn't" enjoy that. That drinking sharpens your social skills and helps you pick up the girls, that doing drugs is bad (but fun), that sex is a need and a requirement and basically the only consolation to our lonely, dreary mortality.

The cultural message today is that stuff will make us happy, and that in turn, happiness is what we want; that status gives us power, and that power is what we want; and overall, that what "everyone else" finds pleasurable and motivating is what YOU should find pleasureable and motivating. But as long as we all are individuals - with individual hopes, fears, beliefs and dreams - this message is entirely false.

We may strive for ideals that are infinite and undefined; joy, love, recognition, intimacy, companionship, peace, spiritual harmony, intellectual fulfillment, and something like Maslow's "self-actualization". Not all of us define or prioritize these ideals in the same way, and life is a journey which may not allow us to realize each of them.

Follow what you believe and don't be swayed by what "everyone else" thinks you should do, say, or enjoy. Forcing yourself to conform will only cause anger, unhappiness, and cognitive dissonance. Don't waste time ruminating on past failures and potential problems. Act in harmony with your values, with consideration for others, and - in everything - respect all life.

Sunday, November 26, 2006

To Bus or Not to Bus

Green or not, I have to admit that sometimes the bus just sucks. Or at least taking it does. On the way out to the pool for my swim lessons, I had the privilege of sitting in a crowded, hot and smelly #7 for a good half hour. Even in November, the BO was terrible (yes, I've been accused of having an extra keen sense of smell... but still!).

I've always hated buses, they always seem full of noisy teenagers, drunkards, and mindlessly staring folks who may be less than freshly showered....

On the other hand, I need to work on my patience and ability to let the little stuff slide. I still prefer walking and cycling to "bussing" ... fresh air kicks ass, and waiting? Who the hell likes waiting?

It really has to do with one's perception of distance. If you walk or jog along certain routes and they become familiar, the journey doesn't seem so far. I also find that my perception of distance changes over the seasons. During a beautiful spring or fall day, a 1-hour walk (oh say, to the bike shop!) is a pleasure, and in no way compares to a 45-min bus ride to get to the same place! However in the middle of February when it's -25 C, a 10-minute walk to the grocery store might as well be a polar expedition.

Saturday, November 25, 2006

Let's keep the water clear, the sky blue and the moss green...!

Thanks to my talented friend Paul for the awesome pix; see more of his stuff here.






























Top to bottom:
Wolfe Lake, Lake Superior, Bay of Fundy.

Technorati Profile

Green Living in Ottawa

Bet you didn't know this staid little city is home to two cutting-edge, ecologically-friendly, LEED-certified residential building projects! And what is LEED, you ask? It stands for "Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design," and LEED certification is a rating system developed by the U.S. Green Building Council.

What makes these condominiums different from all the other generic "white-box" homes? Well they use only about half of the energy and water required by other buildings: they are heated by geothermal energy, and are many times more efficient with regard to insulation. They also offer better indoor air quality, which is partly due to the usage of eco-friendly building materials and partly due to superior ventilation systems. The buildings also encourage enviro-friendly living with bicycle storage rooms, access to car-sharing programs, and the furnishing of new units with energy-efficient appliances.

Check out EcoCité in the Glebe and The Currents at Holland/ Wellington for more details.

Back to Basics with Swiss Hunks

Swiss tourism officials are banking on the "outdoorsy" appeal of their sexy young men in this commercial enticing women over the German border during the World Cup soccer tournament.

Evidence that communion with nature does indeed have its own allure! Watch Mr. Switzerland milk a cow and see for yourself.

Friday, November 24, 2006

The Truth about Paper Coffee Cups

Tonight was a breakthrough night: I swam my first-ever length of each front crawl and backstroke with relatively decent form. Considering that I started swimming lessons 4 weeks ago, I'm pretty proud of myself. So I went out to celebrate with coffee and Poptarts with my swim buddy/ coach. And it got me thinking about paper cups.

Although the "recycled" symbol on the cups and cardboard sleeves had tended to soothe my conscience, I had never really stopped to think about paper cups as landfill stuffers. Well as I learned today, due to the plastic liner bonded to the interior, paper coffee cups are NOT recyclable - even though they are made from recycled materials. So what's the best alternative?

A travel mug, of course, and from now on I'll be using mine more often. I have a good one from MEC: sexy blue, insulated and virtually unbreakable. Most coffee shops will even give you a discount for saving them the expense of a disposable cup.

Other news on the coffee cup front: biodegradable packaging, including coffee cups, is currently being developed (CBC article here). Hey, we have the science, but do we have the marketing prowess and the conviction needed to persuade the public to shell out an extra few cents on the morning cup 'o java?

Thursday, November 23, 2006

Lost in your (Living) Space?

Do you really need a 3-storey, 2-garage home in the suburbs? A big yard, long driveway, and a picket fence? A penthouse or luxury condo all to yourself? Well think again, because there are benefits to "downsizing" your living space:
  1. Cheaper rent/ mortgage/ initial cash outlay.
  2. Cheaper utility bills.
  3. Less energy wasted, and more efficient use of resources.
  4. Less time and money spent cleaning up/ mowing lawn/ renovating!
  5. Increasing population density may encourage social cohesion.
  6. Decreasing urban sprawl protects greenspace and wildlife.
  7. Represents a shift away from consumerism/ materialism.
This week, try to spend a little less time in the comfort of your home (perhaps in front of your state-of-the-art flatscreen television) and a little more time outdoors in the gorgeous late-autumn weather we're having now. Or visit with friends you haven't seen for awhile, go out for dinner with your spouse/ partner, play with your child.

Happiness isn't defined by the "stuff" you own, but is rather a function of the person you are and the person you are becoming.

For the last 4 years, I have lived in an apartment that measures less than 180 square feet. I am still alive and kicking - but just a bit claustrophobic.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Gym-towel Kleptos and the Social Trust

Today at the gym, while my back was turned in the women's changeroom (and literally in 1 minute) some poor drone swiped my gym towel. It was a very functional little towel, wheat-coloured and soft, with fine absorbent qualities - perfect for mopping off sweat during a particularly gruelling workout. It also cost $7 at the local Zellers.

What is so mystifying is her motive. What could she possibly want, on her way out of the gym, with my sweet little Downy-scented towel?

My latest theory is that this woman, who was a bit on the plump side, had a bad day and being at the gym was the last straw. She snapped; she saw my legs and decided to punish me for being a triathlete. Ok ok maybe not ... she's probably a kleptomaniac. But even more sinister: what kind of world do we live in when someone who can afford a gym membership deigns to steal a gym towel before your workout?

I pondered this during my 7 mile tempo run, with sweat pouring down my face and into my eyes, as I tried in vain to wipe my eyes and clear the stinging. All I can hope is that my towel will mean so much more to her than it ever did to me. And in this world, folks, if it isn't nailed down there is someone out there who will steal it.

If I see her next week at the gym and she is stupid enough to bring it along, I'd love to say "nice towel". I'd love to delve into her economic motive for this theivery, to find the point where her sense of entitlement began to trample the rights of others around her. I'd love to shake some respect into everyone for their fellow human. But mostly, I'd just like to be able to turn around for a minute in the changeroom at the YMCA and not have someone swipe my stuff.

Top 5 Reasons to use CFL

Incandescent bulbs are OUT folks, gone with the dinosaurs. There is a better alternative, and it is Compact Fluorescent Lighting - but no longer the slow-starting, flickering bulbs of the past. With the advent of cheaper and smaller bulbs, it's hard to understand why anyone still objects to switching over from the "dark side". Still need a reason to switch?

1. It's cheaper. Replacing a 60-watt incandescent bulb with a 15-watt fluorescent bulb will save you about $36 over the duration of its 10,000-hour rated life. Yes, that does adjust for the slightly higher price you pay at the store.

2. It's climate-friendly. Replacing that same 60-watt incadenscent bulb will also reduce CO2 emissions by 600 pounds during the 10,000-hour time period. Atmospheric CO2 is the major greenhouse gas implicated in global warming.

3. It's cooler. CFL emits only 30% of its energy as heat, while incandescent and halogen lights emit 90% of their energy as heat. This is why a fluorescent bulb requires only 1/3 the energy to produce a certain amount of light.

4. It's safer to use. CFL lasts about 10 times longer than traditional lighting, reducing the need to change bulbs in hard-to-reach places. The lower surface temperature of the bulb also reduces the risk of burns and other safety hazards.

5. It's trendy. Ok, truth is, concern for the environment is IN now. Jump on the bandwagon already.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Styrofoam & the Homeless

Our North American way of life is a "disposable" culture, born of our inability to see the finite nature of our resources. Isn't this our vast and glorious land, sea-to-sea-to-sea? What's a few styrofoam cups here and there?

We can always ship our trash to Michigan, and let those nasty Americans deal with it. Perhaps we'll build a dump out in the country; nevermind the rural folk who have to see and smell our trash every day, the animals whose habitats are now contaminated, the desecration of land.

"I just gotta have my meal to go, do you have any styrofoam?" Says the hungry guy in line at the local soup kitchen.

STYROFOAM WILL NEVER DECOMPOSE.

I volunteer at that soup kitchen. Meals-to-go are not allowed there. Where d'ya gotta go, guy? What's so pressing you can't take 5 minutes to enjoy your free, hot food?

Eventually we'll be seeing all those styrofoam cups. And our children, and theirs. Styrofoam will never decompose.

Monday, November 20, 2006

Orgasm for Peace

If the idea wasn't conceived by a couple of seniors, I wouldn't have given this 70s-era craziness a second glance. But I couldn't resist; see for yourself at www.globalorgasm.org

Now if only we could channel that meditative state and have people not only put down their guns and "make love, not war" but park those SUV's and "make love, not CO2". Oh, and all you lovebirds: don't forget the condoms, because overpopulation is still a problem.

Sweeping Kyoto under the Rug

With this inaugural post I will point out the obvious: Canada has a dismal track record in regard to environmental policy. The Kyoto Accord is a farce; the target for developed nations was set at 6% below the 1990 baseline, but in Canada as of 2003, emissions were 23% OVER this target and continuing to rise. While it is tempting to lay the blame on Alberta for its oil, or Ontario for its industry, or truckers, or airplanes, or Stephen Harper himself, the responsibility is really an individual one; each and every one of us has a role to play in protecting the world around us, our air, water, and land.

The recent UN Climate Change Conference in Nairobi was an embarassing display of (environment minister) Rona Ambrose's pettiness, and a prime example of self-indulgent politicking. Whatever happened to the idea of Canadians being leaders - or even just challengers to our bullying American neighbours - on the world stage? Ironic even, as it is our own ice caps that are melting, our huge Northern regions that are experiencing the most measurable and direct effects of global warming. Ironic, as we are a diverse group of wealthy, tolerant and educated folk who have the resources and organizational structures available to make a difference, to stop this over-consumption and reduce environmental degradation.

It is incredibly unfair to expect developing nations to take the lead on renewable energy, waste management, and conservation. We who have benefitted from haphazard industrialization - and the wealth we borrowed from future generations - must take a leadership role in protecting our environment from further harm.

I don't always agree with Heather Mallick, but check out what she has to say about Ambrose's performance at the UN Climate Conference.